BD environnementale à Radio-Canada

Canada, International Réagir »

Dans la foulée de la Conférence de Paris sur le climat, le sujet environnemental est bien évidemment d'actualité. Radio-Canada a sorti une bande dessinée visant à contre-argumenter sur les climatosceptiques.

Bien que 100% d'accord avec le fait que la science a un consensus extraordinaire sur le sujet, il est quand même décevant de voir que Radio-Canada embarque dans une lutte face aux climatosceptiques en laissant passer des dérisions et des traits caricaturaux sur les personnes qui osent parler contre la voie environnementale. Il y a plusieurs autres façons de passer un message, surtout lorsqu'il s'agit d'une société d'État.

Toujours est-il que sur le fond, il ne fait aucun doute que bien des personnes sont influençables sur la base d'arguments populistes et infondés. La droite, dont je fais partie de manière principalement économique, est visiblement en train de perdre la guerre de la crédibilité en se chamaillant constamment sur ce sujet qui pourtant ne devrait pas avoir d'étiquette politique. Économiquement parlant, il y a des moyens de faire rimer l'environnement avec développement comme le témoigne l'exemple islandais. Mais pour y arriver, encore faudrait-il arrêter cette montée caricaturale de dérision lorsque des opinions divergent.

2015 NHL Playoffs (finals)

Sports Réagir »

With the Tampa Bay victory and the Anaheim lost in the last round, I now have a record of 9 good predictions out of 14 (64.29%) in these playoffs.

In the Stanley Cup finals, the obvious choice would be to go with the Chicago Blackhawks. Their recent history suggest that they can win it all and they have a bunch of clutch players. However I'll go with the Tampa Bay Lightning in this one since I love how they were built and they are in my humble opinion a great representation of how hockey should be played in this era. Let's hope to have a classic matchup!

Tampa Bay vs Chicago

2015 NHL Playoffs (3rd round)

Sports Réagir »

I had 3 good predictions out of 4 in the 2nd round so I now sit at a 66.67% rate (8 good predictions out of 12). We're in the final four and both matchups should be long. Here's my predictions for the Conference finals.

In the East, both the New York Rangers and Tampa Bay Lightning came out of their series in a lot of matches. The Rangers definitely have the advantage in the defensive side of things and usually it's that part of the game that makes the difference. However, I love the Lightning and their depth on offense. They arguably have the best second line in hockey with Kucherov, Johnson and Palat. If Steven Stamkos can give them some clutch goals (he obviously played injured against the Habs) and if Ben Bishop stays sharp, I think they can cause a surprise. The Capitals are a lot like the Lightning and the Rangers had to win it in OT in the seventh game so I believe it's possible for the Lightning to win it.

On the other side, both the Anaheim Ducks and the Chicago Blackhawks came out of the 2nd round with relative ease. They will be fresh and it will be a hard fought battle, that's for sure. I believe that the window for the Blackhawks is closing with the bad contracts they gave to Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews so if they have to win it, this year is their best bet. However the Ducks are a well oiled hockey team. I love their depth on defense. They have the perfect centerman for the playoffs in Ryan Getzlaf and their goalie Frederik Andersen seems in his zone. At that time of the year, offense generated by defensemen can make the difference and the Ducks have a lot of gifted D in that regard. It will be a long series but the Californian based team will win it when it's all said and done.

New York Rangers vs Tampa Bay

Anaheim vs Chicago

2015 NHL Playoffs (2nd round)

Sports Réagir »

With a 62.5% success rate (5 good predictions out of 8) in the first round, I'm still above the 50% mark. The second round seems really hard to predict each and every year and it doesn't seem to change this time around.

In the East, I believe that the Capitals have all the tools to go with an upset against the Rangers. Washington has a much better D this year and I like the balance in their forward group. They will probably need to use four lines and all of their defensemen to keep the pace since they won in 7 against the Islanders. The Rangers do have a well-built team but I'm going with the underdogs in this one.

In the other matchup, Tampa Bay was barely able to beat the Detroit Red Wings yesterday and they'll play tomorrow. Montreal needs to win the first match to take advantage of this fact. However, Jon Cooper's team was really good against the Habs this year. The Lightning will probably be able to score more goals than Ottawa since they have more firepower upfront. If Tampa Bay defence doesn't allow too many chances to Montreal, they should come on top.

Anaheim was able to finish the Jets in four matches and they will be fresh against the Calgary Flames. I do like how Bob Hartley is able to make his team compete but the Ducks are a much better team than the Canucks. The cinderella story of the Flames will vanish in this round.

In what I believe will be the best series in this round, the Blackhawks will square off against the Wild. I thought that the Blues would go a lot farther this year but the Wild played a good style against them. I also believe that the Blackhawks window to win the Stanley Cup is shutting down but in this year playoffs, I have to take Chicago. It should go in six or seven games.

New York Rangers vs Washington
Montreal vs Tampa Bay

Anaheim vs Calgary
Chicago vs Minnesota

2015 NHL Playoffs (1st round)

Sports Réagir »

The best time of the year to love hockey starts this week with the NHL playoffs. As usual, I'll do my best to try to predict the winner of every rounds. Last year I got a 60% success rate (9 good predictions out of 15) while in 2013 I had a score of 80%. Let's get started!

With their Presidents' trophy, the New York Rangers enter the playoffs with a lot of confidence. I surely didn't think the Pittsburgh Penguins would be in such a bad spot at this time of the year when the season started. They barely made the playoffs because of many factors. The biggest one is the fact that their depth is thin besides Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. If the way the Pens played in the last couple of weeks is any indication of things to come, I can't pick them to win many games comes playoff time. The Rangers will win.

The matchup between the Capitals and the Islanders should be a good one. John Tavares is now a complete leader for his team and is amongst the best players in the whole league. Garth Snow shut many mouths with his moves this year as he was able to put a very competitive team on the ice. However I love the way the Caps played this year under Barry Trotz. Alex Ovechkin had an awesome season and their depth at defence has never been better for as long as I can remember. I also believe that Braden Holtby is a more complete goaltender than Jaroslav Halak. I pick the Capitals to triumph.

I don't think there's a better offensive team in the East than the Tampa Bay Lightning. Their depth is scary. Last year was a fluke with the injury of Ben Bishop. Victor Hedman is a sleeper and is in my mind in the top-10 defensemen in the league. Mike Babcock is the center of many rumours and he'll probably want to leave the Red Wings organisation on a high note but unfortunately for him he doesn't have the elements to compete against the Lightning.

In February many people would have called you a crazy person if you told them that the Senators would be in the playoff picture. They are and nobody wants them to fail. The task will be huge against the Canadiens, especially with Carey Price who's the backbone of this organisation. If Andrew Hammond continues his stellar play, that matchup could be a classic. I'll pick the Sens but it's not a rational choice.

St. Louis against Minnesota will be a long, long series. As an Edmonton Oilers fan, I don't know how to feel about Devan Dubnyk's successes. I'm happy for him but he always remind me of how much my beloved team struggles to develop their own draft choices in their organisation. One of my biggest factor in evaluating the playoffs is the depth of a team. The Blues have arguably the biggest depth of the playoff entries this year and therefore should win against the Wild but that's not a bet I'd make with money on the line.

Even if Barry Trotz made a big job with the Capitals this year, his departure from the Predators was a blessing because they had to reinvent themselves and it paid off. Their defence is still unparalleled and with Pekka Rinne on top, it's hard to argue that they have a good chance to go far. However they have to face the Chicago Blackhawks, a well oiled team comes this time of the year. Rinne will probably steals a couple of games but I doubt the Hawks will lose four games in a best-of-seven format.

The Ducks were good all-year long and have probably the greatest pair of forwards in the West with Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry. Winnipeg fans will explode this year and that factor alone will probably make the Jets with a game or two at home. Anaheim is the safest choice but my heart can't go against the Jets so therefore my pick goes to Manitoba's team.

In the second all-Canadian matchup the Canucks will square-off against the Calgary Flames. Both teams had surprising seasons and fully deserve their playoff birth. The Canucks have more experience in the playoffs and that's something to take into consideration for the first game. However I'd like to see Johnny Gaudreau plays as much as possible and Bob Hartley is the kind of coach to get the best of his players. This matchup will go to 6 or 7 games and I pick the cinderella Flames to come on top.

New York Rangers vs Pittsburgh
Washington vs New York Islanders
Tampa Bay vs Detroit
Montreal vs Ottawa

St. Louis vs Minnesota
Nashville vs Chicago
Anaheim vs Winnipeg
Vancouver vs Calgary

This collection ©2018 by Guillaume Sirois. multi-blog / hébergement web / F P.
Design & icons by N.Design Studio. Skin by Tender Feelings / / Evo Factory / Modifi par: Guillaume Sirois.